Ghosts: The Ghost of Flight 401!

Readers, I’ve been watching old movies on youTube and this one’s a tue story.  If you don’t want to watch the film, there’s a book by John Fuller on the subject, or you can check the wiki.  It tells the tale of sightings of the spirit of one of the pilots who’d died as a result of the crash of Eastern Airlines Flight 401 into the Everglades (this occurred on 29 December 1972).  According to many witnesses, the pilot’s ghost was seen from time to time in aircraft (from different airlines) which contained parts salvaged from the wreck of Flight 401.  It was witnessed by air crew as well as passengers.  It’s an interesting movie as a ghost story and for that reason, I recommend it (it is pretty dated, but a good yarn nonetheless). And think about the idea of the spirit attaching itself somehow to the remains of the crashed aircraft . . . interesting concept . . .

Photo: By Versageek (Own work) [GFDL ( or CC BY 3.0 (, via Wikimedia Commons

For more ghosts, please see




Mob Haiku: Miss Trial

Dom, so still in court:

he was known as the Statue

of Limitations.

For more Mob days in court, please see Pasta La Vista, Baby: Mob Haiku to Die For at


Ghosts: “Spirited” Wineries!

I’ll drink to that!  Here’s a great assortment of winery ghosts – from Notebook of Ghosts.  Enjoy with a glass of your favourite vintage, be it Chateau Rothschild or Chateau Yellow Tail 🙂

To celebrate my return to blogging after a short break (not of my choice!), I decided to explore ghosts through one of my favorite pastimes: drinking wine! I do not have the luxury to see many vineyards in person, but visiting them through their ghost stories is just as fun. The following vineyards and wineries […]

via Pour A Glass of Wine for the Spirits: Haunted Vineyards and Wineries — Notebook of Ghosts

For more ghosts, please see my amazon link, and for a fun short read, please check out my newest: a short collection of four stories centered around haunted antique photos, Sepia Seepage!  Free on amazon unlimited, and like all my e-book titles, only 99 cents to purchase.



Mob Haiku: Father Nature

Paulie: into his

ATV, mountains.  We called

him the Quadfather.

For more Mob R&R, please see




Ghosts: A Haunting in Seattle

Readers,  I invite you to explore this very frightening tale of a truly haunted house in Seattle. From

via True Stories of Being Haunted in Suburban Seattle

For more ghosts, please see


Mob Haiku: Head Turner

When Tino got nabbed

for Possession, his call went

to Fr. Ricci.

For more Mob spiritual issues, please see Pasta La Vista Baby:  Mob Haiku to Die For at



Ghosts: Some Thoughts About Support For Those Who’ve Seen Ghosts

Any famous, contemporary haunting will be trumpeted by both advocates: “It’s real!  I saw it!”  and naysayers “Hokum! No such thing as ghosts.  You imagined it all.”

A fundamental problem is that it may well be impossible to prove the existence of ghosts.  We use scientific methodology to chase psycho-spiritual phenomena.  Something inevitably gets lost in that translation.  And, instead of paying attention to the witness, we may have preconceived notions about what we think he saw, and we let those block us from hearing what he’s trying to describe.

Most ghost stories are shared by people who truly experienced something. There are so many sightings. If all the witnesses were residents of mental hospitals, or on drugs, that would be one thing. But they’re not.  For the most part, they are everyday folk who’ve stubbed toes on the inexplicable.  They are puzzled.  They may be frightened.  They don’t know where to go for support.

Ghost hunting telecasts may not offer much, therapeutically:  they may provide sensationalized accounts, sometimes filmed in the Blair Witch style – via jerky hand-held camera. We hear plenty of “OMG!” but never see for ourselves what the ghost hunters supposedly do.  There are shadows and sounds, but so what?  Most houses have those.

What about the church, you ask.  What indeed.  The church, which should offer triage for spiritual fears, in fact often brushes them off, minimizes them, or blames the victim “Now, now Mr. Jones . . .”  It may be more difficult to run for office  than to qualify for exorcism, or even short of that, to find and obtain the specialized kind of spiritual/emotional care needed.  It takes open-minded, educated clergy.  We are no longer a culture in which everyone attends church: far from it.  So while that may be a resource for some, many won’t go there for help.

Psychology specialists’ approach is often a diagnosis of some emotional or mental dysfunction.  The very idea that independent ghostly phenomena exists and was experienced may not be accepted.  It can be written off as delusion, subconscious, “waking dream,” etc.  Again, the kind of psychology professional who is attuned and can be of real support to people experiencing the inexplicable does exist – but like clergy who are able to be of genuine help, they may be a select island in a sea of naysayers.

My take is that ghosts exist, regardless of our recognition that they do (or don’t).  They exist whether we see them or not (in many cases, one individual in the room sees or hears something, the others miss it).  Witnesses deserve support, and if requested, assistance. They don’t deserve to be confronted with doubts, negativity, minimizing, or explaining away what occurred.  Would you do that to a victim of other traumatizing events? Of course not. A comparison might be a victim of a home invasion:  this person feels a sense of invasion, as well as loss of personal property. A person who’s experienced paranormal phenomena may feel spiritually/psychologically invaded, and may experience a loss of certainty/security.

The motivation of those supporting the person who’s seen ghosts (ideally, clergy, psychology and medical professionals) should be to support the  witness, and to work towards his health and peace of mind and spirit.  They should not be there in order to gain anything personally (book, internet, or movie fame), nor to “disprove” or “debunk” the paranormal, nor to use it as a ladder to participate in that exorcism one always wanted to perform, or some new therapy. It’s not about them. The individual(s) who experienced the ghost deserve quality support without strings.

It may help to take this out of context. If you got sick, you’d go to the doctor without having to be part of his research project (unless he has your consent).  If you call in a gardener for your yard, you expect him to clean up the weeds, not to tell you the weeds are all in your mind.

What kind of help might be valuable, what might be detrimental, what’s ethical, and what keeps the matter centered on the witness and what he experienced rather than hijacking it for other purposes?

I used to assist in ethical inquiries in difficult hospital cases: we had to consider things like beneficence (will it do the patient good?), maleficence (will it be harmful to the patient?), justice (is it fair?), autonomy (the patient’s right to decide).  These are good criteria for working with those who have encountered the unexplainable, too, whether you are a doctor, clergy, a counselor or psychologist, or a friend.

Like cancer patients or lepers, people who witness paranormal phenomena can victimized. They may be told they must have somehow invited the event, or that they are in some way to blame.  The outcome is that people may be reluctant to share what they’ve seen:  they don’t want to be labeled as dysfunctional or crazy.

While ghosts and other odd phenomena have been reported for as long as mankind has been telling stories round campfires, such tales are relegated to the rubbish heap in modern times.  We don’t buy it. We bring in magnetometers, EVP recorders and other devices to “prove” the existence of ghosts when all these may prove is that the equipment picks up something – not precisely what it detects.

Our go-to position often, sadly, is to discredit the witnesses. That’s wrong: they’re just reporting what they’ve experienced. Monday morning quarterbacking isn’t helpful: you weren’t there, you don’t know what took place.  Picking it apart later disrespects the witness (as well as demonstrating narrow-mindedness). It  may well be that we cannot explain what happened:  so don’t try to unless you’ve been asked for your thoughts.

I hope these thoughts are helpful for both those experiencing paranormal phenomena and for those who may be called in to support them.  They can be summed up as follows:

  • Be of support to the witness
  • Don’t pass judgment on the event, don’t diminish the experience or the viewer
  • Don’t blame the witness
  • Don’t assess the phenomena unless you are asked to and have some knowledge in the field.
  • For someone traumatized, seek qualified and open-minded professionals (but not so open-minded their brains fall out): clergy, psychology/counseling, parapsychologists, medical, etc.
  • In working with those who have experienced ghosts, be ethical: do good, don’t do anything that might cause harm, allow them a say in their fate/how you proceed.
  • Be sensitive
  • Listen
  • Be kind

For more ghosts, please see:


Mob Haiku: Hear, Hear!

The Sit Down got so

loud, cops were called. ‘Twas a case

of Racketeering.

Photo:By Remo Nassi ([1] & [2]) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

For more Mob agenda, please see Pasta La Vista, Baby: Mob Haiku to Die For at



Ghosts: A Ghost in a Tavern! From Tripping on Legends

Readers, here’s a noted New England haunting – from someone who’s been there!  Enjoy this tale of a haunted tavern from Tripping on Legends.

This was a classic haunted I first heard about in the early days of researching. I got the story because my parents ate there on an almost weekly basis. The legend was already hot by then, but when I published it in Jeff Belanger’s Encyclopedia of Haunted Places, it’s infamy grew. There is less spoken […]

via The Country Tavern — Tripping on Legends

For more ghosts, please see:


Mob Haiku: Frauda

Vito sold faux goods:

Quitton, Dyeore, Lessboutin;

Bill Brass and ZegNo.

For Even More, please see my amazon page: